Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.887
Filtrar
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 157, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: At present, eradication regimens for non-Helicobacter pylori Helicobacter (NHPH) have not been established yet. We investigated effectiveness of the standard triple-drug combination therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication and of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) monotherapy in eradication of NHPH. METHODS: Subjects were the patients who were diagnosed with NHPH-infected gastritis based on microscopic findings, helical-shaped organisms obviously larger than Helicobacter pylori, in the gastric mucosal specimens using Giemsa staining at Kenwakai Hospital between November 2010 and September 2021, whose NHPH species were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of urease genes in endoscopically-biopsied samples, and who consented to NHPH eradication with either the triple-drug combination therapy for one week or a PPI monotherapy for six months. Six months after the completion of eradication, its result was determined with esophagogastroduodenoscopy, microscopic examination, and PCR analysis. In cases of unsuccessful eradication, a second eradication with the other therapy was suggested to the patient. RESULTS: PCR analysis detected NHPH in 38 patients: 36 as Helicobacter suis and two as Helicobacter heilmannii/Helicobacter ailurogastricus. Fourteen Helicobacter suis-infected and one Helicobacter heilmannii/Helicobacter ailurogastricus-infected patients requested eradication therapy. The triple-drug combination therapy succeeded in four of five patients, while the PPI monotherapy succeeded in five of 10 patients. Three of five patients who had been unsuccessful with the latter therapy requested the triple-drug combination therapy as the second eradication and all three were successful. In total, the triple-drug combination therapy succeeded in seven out of eight (87.5%) attempted cases, while the PPI monotherapy in five out of 10 (50%) attempted cases. CONCLUSIONS: In NHPH eradication, the triple-drug combination therapy was considered to be effective to some extent and to become the first-line therapy. While, although less successful, PPI monotherapy appeared to be a potentially promising option particularly for patients with allergy or resistance to antibiotics. Effectiveness of PPI monotherapy may be attributed to hyperacid environment preference of Helicobacter suis and PPI's acid-suppressive effect. Additionally, male predominance in NHPH-infected gastritis patients may be explained by gender difference in gastric acid secretory capacity. However, further evidence needs to be accumulated. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Kenwakai Hospital (No. 2,017,024).


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Gastritis , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter heilmannii , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Gastritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Gastritis/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Helicobacter heilmannii/aislamiento & purificación , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Claritromicina/administración & dosificación , Claritromicina/uso terapéutico , Helicobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Helicobacter/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Mucosa Gástrica/microbiología , Mucosa Gástrica/patología
2.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e074188, 2024 Apr 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38684278

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of seven Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) combined with conventional triple/quadruple therapy (T/Q) for Helicobacter pylori-positive peptic ulcers. DESIGN: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP database, Wanfang database, ScienceDirect, EBSCO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and PubMed were searched through 1 June 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing CPMs combined with T/Q for H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers were included. The CPMs included Anweiyang capsule, Jianweiyuyang tablets/capsule/granule, Jinghuaweikang capsule, Kangfuxin liquid, Puyuanhewei capsule, Weifuchun tablets/capsule and Weisu granule. At least one of the following outcome indicators was recorded: complete ulcer healing rate (CUHR), effective rate (ER), H. pylori eradication rate (HPER), rate of peptic ulcer recurrence (RPUR) and incidence of adverse reactions (IAR). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two researchers independently conducted the study selection and extracted data for included studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A pairwise meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V.5.3. Network meta-analysis was performed using STATA/MP V.15.0. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 36 RCTs involving 3620 patients were included. Compared with T/Q alone, Weisu+T/Q, Weifuchun+T/Q and Puyuanhewei+T/Q had the highest CUHR, ER and HPER, respectively. Weisu+T/Q and Jianweiyuyang+T/Q had the lowest RPUR and IAR, respectively. The cluster analysis results showed Jianweiyuyang+T/Q might be the best choice concerning efficacy and safety simultaneously, followed by Kangfuxin+T/Q. CONCLUSION: Among the combination therapies with the CPMs, Jianweiyuyang+T/Q might be the most favourable option for H. pylori-positive peptic ulcers, followed by Kangfuxin+T/Q. Considering the limited quantity and quality of the included RCTs, the results should be interpreted with caution. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022327687.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Metaanálisis en Red , Úlcera Péptica , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos/efectos adversos , Úlcera Péptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera Péptica/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Antiulcerosos/uso terapéutico , Antiulcerosos/administración & dosificación , Antiulcerosos/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/efectos adversos
4.
Helicobacter ; 29(2): e13077, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682268

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A novel regimen with high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) has emerged, but its impact on the gut microbiota is not well understood. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of HDDT on the gut microbiota and compare it with that of bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT). METHODS: We enrolled outpatients (18-70 years) diagnosed with Helicobacter pylori infection by either histology or a positive 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) and randomly assigned to either the BQT or HDDT group. Subjects consented to provide fecal samples which were collected at baseline, Week 2, and Week 14. Amplification of the V1 and V9 regions of the 16S rRNA was conducted followed by high-throughput sequencing. RESULTS: Ultimately, 78 patients (41 patients in the HDDT group and 37 in the BQT group) were enrolled in this study. Eradication therapy significantly altered the diversity of the gut microbiota. However, the alpha diversity rebounded only in the HDDT group at 12 weeks post-eradication. Immediately following eradication, the predominance of Proteobacteria, replacing commensal Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, did not recover after 12 weeks. Species-level analysis showed that the relative abundances of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia fergusonii significantly increased in both groups at Week 2. Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis significantly increased in the BQT group, with no significant difference observed in the HDDT group. After 12 weeks of treatment, the relative abundance of more species in the HDDT group returned to baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Eradication of H. pylori can lead to an imbalance in gut microbiota. Compared to BQT, the HDDT is a regimen with milder impact on gut microbiota.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bismuto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Bismuto/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Helicobacter pylori/fisiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Heces/microbiología , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Bacterias/clasificación , Bacterias/genética , Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias/aislamiento & purificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación
5.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 20(4): 225-233, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38600865

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors are cornerstones in the treatment of Hormone Receptor (HR) positive and Human Epidermal Growth factor (HER2) negative metastatic breast cancer. Given their widespread use in the metastatic setting and emerging use in the adjuvant setting, studying drug-drug interactions (DDI) of these medications is of utmost importance. AREAS COVERED: This review provides key background information on the CDK4/6 inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. We discuss drug-drug interactions including those with proton pump inhibitors as well as CYP3A substrates, inhibitors, and inducers. We describe the effect of these drugs on membrane transporters and their substrates as well as those drugs that increase risk of CDK4/6 toxicities. Finally, we explore future directions for strategies to minimize drug-drug interactions. EXPERT OPINION: It is crucial to be mindful of medications that may interfere with drug absorption, such as proton pump inhibitors, as well as those that interfere with drug metabolism, such as CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers. Additionally, special consideration should be given to populations at higher risk for polypharmacy, such as older patients with greater comorbidities. These interactions and patient characteristics should be considered when developing individual treatment plans with CDK4/6 inhibitors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinasa 4 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Quinasa 6 Dependiente de la Ciclina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Femenino , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Aminopiridinas/administración & dosificación , Aminopiridinas/efectos adversos , Aminopiridinas/farmacología , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/farmacología , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/farmacología , Piridinas/farmacocinética
6.
In Vivo ; 38(3): 1285-1291, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688634

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: Recent research has increasingly demonstrated an association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and serious adverse events. This study aimed to evaluate the association between PPI and rhabdomyolysis (RM), examining its time-to-onset profiles using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data spanning from April 2004 to March 2022 were used. The association between PPIs and RM was evaluated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), adjusted for sex and age. Subsequent analyses were conducted after excluding cases involving concomitant use of statins or fibrates. Furthermore, the onset time of RM and Weibull distribution parameters were calculated to evaluate the expression profile of RM, and the outcomes were examined. RESULTS: RM was associated with the use of esomeprazole, omeprazole, and rabeprazole, even in the absence of concomitant statin or fibrate use. The median time to RM onset varied among PPIs, ranging from 6.5 to 127 d. The Weibull distribution parameters indicated that the hazard types of nearly all orally administered PPIs were classified as early failure or close to random failure. Regarding outcomes, cases of death were reported for all PPIs except vonoprazan. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest the need for vigilant monitoring of RM during PPI administration, particularly in the early stages, considering the varying onset times.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Farmacovigilancia , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Rabdomiólisis , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Rabdomiólisis/inducido químicamente , Rabdomiólisis/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Esomeprazol/efectos adversos , Esomeprazol/administración & dosificación
7.
Surg Endosc ; 38(5): 2788-2794, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587640

RESUMEN

AIM: To analyze efficacy of endoscopic lithotripsy combined with drug lithotripsy as compared with drug lithotripsy for the treatment of phytobezoars. METHODS: We collected and evaluated case records of 165 patients with phytobezoars from 2014 to 2023. And we analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics, imaging features, endoscopic features, complications of phytobezoars, and compared efficacy between endoscopic lithotripsy combined with drug lithotripsy (Group A) and drug lithotripsy (sodium bicarbonate combined with proton pump inhibitor) (Group B). RESULTS: The median age of patients with phytobezoars was 67.84 ± 4.286 years old. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom and peptic ulcers (67.5%) were the most common complication. Bezoar-induced ulcers were more frequent in the gastric angle. The success rate of phytobezoars vanishing in Group A and Group B were similar (92.3% vs. 85.1% within 48 h, 98.7% vs. 97.7% within a week), while the average hospitalization period, average hospitalization cost, second endoscopy rate, and average endoscopic operation time were significantly lower in patients in Group B than in Group A. CONCLUSION: Drug lithotripsy is the preferred effective and safe treatment option for phytobezoars. We advise that an endoscopy should be completed after 48 h for drug lithotripsy.


Asunto(s)
Bezoares , Litotricia , Humanos , Bezoares/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Litotricia/métodos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Bicarbonato de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Bicarbonato de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Dolor Abdominal/terapia
8.
J Dig Dis ; 25(3): 163-175, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577962

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To update evidence-based data comparing the efficacy and safety of high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection through meta-analysis. METHODS: Multiple databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to May 18, 2023. Dichotomous data were evaluated using risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, risk of bias assessment, and quality of evidence evaluation were performed. RESULTS: Twenty RCTs containing 7891 subjects were included in the analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in H. pylori eradication rate between HDDT and BQT in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (86.31% vs 84.88%; RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, P = 0.12). In the per-protocol (PP) analysis, the eradication rates for HDDT and BQT were 90.27% and 89.94%, respectively (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.03, P = 0.44). Adverse events were significantly lower with HDDT than with BQT (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.38-0.51, P < 0.00001). Patient adherence was significantly different between the two groups (RR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03, P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis based on antibiotic combinations within the BQT group showed a significantly higher eradication rate for HDDT than for BQT only when BQT used amoxicillin combined with clarithromycin (P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: HDDT showed comparable efficacy with BQT for H. pylori eradication, with fewer adverse effects and higher compliance. Due to regional differences, antibiotic resistance rates, and combined BQT antibiotics, more studies are needed for further validation and optimization of HDDT.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Bismuto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bismuto/administración & dosificación , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación
9.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 36(6): 712-719, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38526917

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The vonoprazan (VPZ)-amoxicillin (AMO) dual therapy (VA) demonstrates a satisfactory eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori ). However, the optimal dosage of AMO in this regimen remains uncertain. The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of different doses of AMO in the VA regimen for first-line treatment of H. pylori infection. METHODS: A total of 192 treatment-naive H. pylori -infected patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: low-dose VA (LD-VA: VPZ 20 mg b.i.d + AMO 750 mg t.i.d), moderate-dose VA (MD-VA:VPZ 20 mg b.i.d + AMO 1000 mg t.i.d), and high-dose VA (HD-VA: VPZ 20 mg b.i.d + AMO 1250 mg t.i.d). All groups received 14 days of treatment. The study evaluated and compared the eradication rates, adverse events (AEs), and patient compliance among the three groups. RESULTS: Eradication rates for LD-VA, MD-VA, and HD-VA were 76.6% (49/64), 79.7% (51/64), and 84.4% (54/64), respectively, as determined by intention-to-treat analysis; 90.6% (48/53), 94.3% (50/53), and 98.1% (53/54) according to per-protocol analysis; 89.1% (49/55), 94.4% (51/54), and 96.4% (54/56) with modified intention-to-treat analysis (all P  > 0.05). Although not statistically significant, numerically higher eradication rates were observed with the higher dose AMO VA regimen. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of AEs and compliance among the three VA regimens. CONCLUSION: Fourteen-day VA regimens with AMO doses exceeding 2 g/day demonstrated satisfactory eradication rates. HD-VA therapy is potentially the most effective regimen. Large-sample clinical trials are required to further validate these findings.


Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina , Antibacterianos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/administración & dosificación , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Adulto , China , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Anciano
10.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 22(5): 981-993.e11, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38184099

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a serious complication. There are limited data on the benefit of preventive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use to reduce the risk of UGIB in DOAC users. METHODS: We included patients with AF receiving DOAC from 2015 to 2020 based on the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. The propensity score (PS) weighting method was used to compare patients with PPI use and those without PPI use. The primary outcome was hospitalization for UGIB. Weighted hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: A total of 165,624 patients were included (mean age: 72.2 ± 10.8 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4.3 ± 1.8; mean HAS-BLED score: 3.3 ± 1.2). Among them, 99,868 and 65,756 were in the non-PPI group and PPI group, respectively. During a median follow-up of 1.5 years, the PPI group was associated with lower risks of hospitalization for UGIB and UGIB requiring red blood cell transfusion than non-PPI group (weighted HR, 0.825; 95% CI, 0.761-0.894 and 0.798; 95% CI, 0.717-0.887, respectively, both P < .001). The benefits of PPI on the risk of hospitalization for UGIB were greater in those with older age (≥75 years), higher HAS-BLED score (≥3), prior GIB history, and concomitant use of antiplatelet agent (all P-for-interaction < .1). Low-dose PPI was consistently associated with a lower risk of significant UGIB by 43.6-49.3% (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large Asian cohort of patients with AF on DOAC, PPI co-therapy is beneficial for reducing the risk of hospitalization for UGIB, particularly in high-risk patients.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , República de Corea , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Administración Oral , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 39(5): 796-805, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38263507

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Up to 40% of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients experience inadequate symptom relief with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), termed PPI-resistant or refractory GERD. Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, has better efficacy than PPI in suppressing gastric acid secretion. This meta-analysis summarizes the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan for treating PPI-resistant GERD (both erosive esophagitis [EE] and non-erosive reflux disease [NERD]). METHODS: Four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL) were searched for studies indexed until August 1, 2023. Both observational studies and clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan in PPI-resistant GERD were included. Efficacy outcomes included healing and maintenance rates of EE and improvement of the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) scores. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were considered a safety outcome. The modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess study quality. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. Healing rates of PPI-resistant EE with vonoprazan 20 mg were 91.7% (95% CI 86.8-94.8%) and 88.5% (95% CI 69.7-96.2%) at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. For healed PPI-resistant EE, the overall maintenance rates with vonoprazan 10 mg were 82.6% (95% 61.2-95.0%) at week 8, 86.0% (95% CI 72.1-94.7%) at week 24, and 93.8% (95% CI 69.8-99.8%) at week 48. FSSG scores were improved in 74.6% (95% CI 65.8-81.7%) and 51.9% (95% CI 37.8-65.7%) of patients at weeks 4 and 8. Overall, no SAE was reported. CONCLUSION: Vonoprazan demonstrated high efficacy in the healing and maintenance of PPI-resistant EE and moderate efficacy for the improvement of FSSG score. Vonoprazan was well tolerated in PPI-resistant GERD patients.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Medicamentos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Pirroles , Sulfonamidas , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico , Sulfonamidas/efectos adversos , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
BMJ Open ; 13(4): e066070, 2023 04 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37080617

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This mixed-methods feasibility study aimed to explore parents' and medical practitioners' views on the acceptability and design of a clinical trial to determine whether routine prophylactic proton pump inhibitors (PPI) reduce the incidence of anastomotic stricture in infants with oesophageal atresia (OA). DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews with UK parents of an infant with OA and an online survey, telephone interviews and focus groups with clinicians. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: We interviewed 18 parents of infants with OA. Fifty-one clinicians (49 surgeons, 2 neonatologists) from 20/25 (80%) units involved in OA repair completed an online survey and 10 took part in 1 of 2 focus groups. Interviews were conducted with two clinicians whose survey responses indicated they had concerns about the trial. OUTCOME MEASURES: Parents and clinicians ranked the same top four outcomes ('Severity of anastomotic stricture', 'Incidence of anastomotic stricture', 'Need for treatment of reflux' and 'Presence of symptoms of reflux') as important to measure for the proposed trial. RESULTS: All parents and most clinicians found the use, dose and duration of omeprazole as the intervention medication, and the placebo control, as acceptable. Parents stated they would hypothetically consent to their child's participation in the trial. Concerns of a few parents and clinicians about infants suffering with symptomatic reflux, and the impact of this for study retention, appeared to be alleviated through the symptomatic reflux treatment pathway. Hesitant clinician views appeared to change through discussion of parental support for the study and by highlighting existing research that questions current practice of PPI treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that parents and most clinicians view the proposed Treating Oesophageal Atresia with prophylactic proton pump inhibitors to prevent STricture (TOAST) trial to be feasible and acceptable so long as infants can be given PPI if clinicians deem it clinically necessary. This insight into parent and clinician views and concerns will inform pilot phase trial monitoring, staff training and the development of the trial protocol.


Asunto(s)
Atresia Esofágica , Estenosis Esofágica , Omeprazol , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Constricción Patológica/prevención & control , Atresia Esofágica/complicaciones , Atresia Esofágica/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/etiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/prevención & control , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Estenosis Esofágica/etiología , Estenosis Esofágica/prevención & control , Quimioprevención , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Padres , Médicos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Omeprazol/administración & dosificación , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Adulto
13.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 71(12): 28-31, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736051

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand the national pattern of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions and to disseminate evidence-based recommendations for using probiotics as an adjunct to PPIs across diverse clinical indications. METHODS: Healthcare professionals' (HCPs) inputs and views were collected through a survey (n = 1,007) and four round table meetings (RTMs, n = 4). A standardized questionnaire focusing on the utilization of PPIs in clinical practice was developed, deliberated upon, and assessed by experts specializing in the treatment of diverse acid-related gastrointestinal (GI) conditions across various geographical regions. RESULTS: Of the total 1,007 contributors, most (43.40%) opined that 10-30% of their patients were prescribed PPI for a long duration. The majority of contributors commonly prescribed PPIs for the prophylaxis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-induced gastritis (70.90%), peptic ulcer disease (58.39%), and various GI conditions. The majority of contributors (91%) agreed or strongly agreed that long-term use of PPIs disturbs the GI flora. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) (78.05%) was the most preferred indication for using pre- and probiotics. The duration for co-prescription varied, with a substantial portion advocating for 1-4 weeks (49.65%), while others supported durations of 4-8 weeks or beyond. Around 85% of contributors/HCPs agreed or strongly agreed on prescribing pre- and probiotics as prophylaxis to prevent GI disturbances. The study emphasized the growing trend of patient-centered co-prescription of PPIs and pre-/probiotics, with a majority of contributors favoring this approach. CONCLUSION: The results underscore the importance of informed prescribing practices, including the co-prescription of probiotics, to mitigate potential side effects associated with long-term PPI use and optimize patient well-being.


Asunto(s)
Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Probióticos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/tratamiento farmacológico
14.
Pak J Pharm Sci ; 35(1(Supplementary)): 195-201, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35228177

RESUMEN

Lansoprazole (LPZ) show poor bioavailability because of first pass effect and absorption factors. The floating delivery systems could reduce fluctuations in plasma drug concentration through maintaining desirable plasma drug concentration. The objective of present study was to enhance bioavailability despite first pass effect through continuous availability of drug from floating system. Gum tragacanth (GT) and itaconic acid (IA) based floating hydrogels (FH) were synthesized. Parameters optimized were; microwave radiation exposure time, pH, GT:IA ratio and concentration of the glutaraldehyde. Optimized FH were evaluated for entrapment efficiency (% EE), in-vitro release, FTIR, SEM, and in- vitro and in-vivo floating study. Finally, pharmacokinetic was evaluated in ulcer-induced SD rats. Grafting percentage, swelling ratio and %EE of LPZ was 115%, Ì´250% and 90%, respectively. Microwave radiation exposure time, pH of reaction medium, GT:IA ratios and cross linker concentration were 2 min, pH 5, ratios 2:1 and 0.02%, respectively. The optimized FH showed acceptable floating behavior. The X-ray images revealed that hydrogels remained floated over gastric contents up to 24 hours. The in-vitro release and pharmacokinetics revealed availability of LPZ upto to 24h in-vitro and in ulcer-induced SD rats, respectively. The present hydrogels based floating system of lansoprazole is capable to extend the gastric residence time upto 24 hours.


Asunto(s)
Lansoprazol/química , Lansoprazol/farmacocinética , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/química , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacocinética , Animales , Área Bajo la Curva , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Semivida , Lansoprazol/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley
15.
PLoS One ; 17(2): e0263247, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35130287

RESUMEN

A recent study suggested that proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) was associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, the clinical impact of PPI use on the outcome of patients receiving ICIs for postoperative recurrent NSCLC is unknown. The outcomes of 95 patients with postoperative recurrence of NSCLC receiving ICIs at 3 medical centers in Japan were analyzed. We conducted adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analyses with the log-rank test, a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, and a logistic regression analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to minimize the bias arising from the patients' backgrounds. The IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves revealed that the progression-free survival (PFS), but not the overall survival (OS), was significantly longer in patients who did not receive PPIs than in those who did receive them. The IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed that PPI use was an independent poor prognostic factor for the PFS and OS. Furthermore, in the IPTW-adjusted logistic regression analysis, PPI non-use was an independent predictor of disease control. In this multicenter and retrospective study, PPI use was associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with postoperative recurrence of NSCLC who were receiving ICIs. PPIs should not be prescribed indiscriminately to patients with postoperative recurrence of NSCLC who intend to receive ICIs. These findings should be validated in a future prospective study.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Transversales , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Japón/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Periodo Posoperatorio , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 78(1): 35-41, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34714373

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has been linked to an increased risk of osteoporosis, with various indirect mechanisms so far identified. Although no direct underlying mechanism for effect on bone cells have been investigated with the use of PPIs. Melastatin-like transient receptor potential 7 (TRPM7)channel has been engaged in the proliferation of bone cells. TRPM7 channel is regulated by extracellular Mg2+ and Ca2+ level, that further encourages to analyse if any imbalance with pantoprazole usage could alter bone remodelling process mediated by TRPM7. OBJECTIVES: The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of pantoprazole on the calcium and magnesium level, the cations involved in the bone remodelling process, as well as role of the TRPM7 channel in the proliferation of bone cells. METHODS: A cytotoxicity study was carried out to study the effect of pantoprazole on the bone cell using MC3T3-E1 cell line, together with the expression of TRPM7 was determined post-pantoprazole treatment. An in vivo study in rats was carried out for estimation of Ca2+, Mg2+ and Ca2+/Mg2+ ratio as well as bone strength was measured over a duration of 4 weeks and 8 weeks with the treatment of pantoprazole. A pilot-scale clinical study was carried out in patients with a fracture to support the evidence of preliminary findings from in-vitro and in vivo studies. RESULTS: MC3T3-E1 cell line treated with pantoprazole showed decreased cell viability in a dose-dependent manner and reduced expression of TRPM7 channel, evidencing interaction of TRPM7 and pantoprazole in the bone remodelling process. A pilot study conducted on 12 patients having major fractures showed changes in serum Mg2+ and Ca2+ levels over a period of 1 month as well as the animal study also showed ionic imbalance over 8-week treatment with pantoprazole. Bone density measured for the patient at the end of the 1-month treatment was found to be in the osteopenic category, together with the animal study which showed a decrease in femur bone strength for the animal treated with pantoprazole over a period of 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: The study findings proved a negative impact of pantoprazole use on Ca2+ and Mg2+ levels, which can impact TRPM7-mediated bone remodelling which serves to be a possible mechanism for osteoporosis upon pantoprazole use.


Asunto(s)
Huesos/efectos de los fármacos , Pantoprazol/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacología , Canales Catiónicos TRPM/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Densidad Ósea , Calcio/metabolismo , Línea Celular , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Magnesio/metabolismo , Masculino , Pantoprazol/administración & dosificación , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Ratas , Ratas Wistar
17.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 78(3): 365-373, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34705066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acid-suppressive drugs (ASDs) are being used by increasing number of children and young adults. However, evidence for a relationship between ASD use and the risk of fracture in these groups of patients is conflicting. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of fracture in children and young adults exposed to ASDs. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to November 2020. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to determine the relationship of ASD use with fracture risk in children and young adults. RESULTS: Six studies reporting the outcomes of more than 900,000 children and young adults with ASD use were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled RR for fracture with the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) versus non-use of these medications was 1.17 (95% CI = 1.1-1.25; P < 0.001) in children and 1.2 (95% CI = 0.87-1.65; P = 0.272) in young adults. By contrast, the use of histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) was not significantly associated with fracture risk in children (RR, 1.08, 95% CI = 0.99-1.17; P = 0. 083) or young adults (RR, 1.08, 95% CI = 0.82-1.42; P = 0.589). Significant statistical and clinical heterogeneity among studies were determined for the main analysis and most of the subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides evidence linking PPI use to an increased risk of fracture in children. Thus, the use of PPIs in these patients should be carefully considered. However, randomized controlled studies are needed to determine causality and the role of unmeasured/residual confounding factors in this association.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Antagonistas de los Receptores H2 de la Histamina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
18.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 21(1): 127-132, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34494498

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased in the last 10 years in children. Data regarding their safety profile are limited. The aim of this study was to analyze data from the Italian spontaneous reporting system (SRS) database to evaluate the incidence and characteristics of PPI-related adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in children. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective study analyzing PPI-related ADR reports in children in the Italian SRS database between January 1st, 2001, and December 31st, 2020. ADRs were coded according to the system organ class term level. Factors associated with ADR seriousness were investigated. RESULTS: Seventy spontaneous reports of ADRs related to PPIs were analyzed. Esomeprazole and lansoprazole caused the highest number of ADRs equally (27% respectively), and the most frequently reported ADRs presented with gastrointestinal (24%) and/or skin manifestations (21.3%). More than a half of PPI prescriptions were off label for pediatric population. Serious ADRs were 19 (27.1%). Serious ADRs were more frequent in reports presenting PPIs combined with other drugs in comparison to reports with PPI single therapies (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: PPI-related ADRs in children are mostly not serious, and combination therapy seems to be associated with ADR seriousness.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacovigilancia , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Italia , Masculino , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(1): 224-232, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33534012

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is extremely common. PPIs have been suggested to affect the gut microbiome, and increase risks of Clostridium difficile infection and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). However, existing data are based on stool analyses and PPIs act on the foregut. AIMS: To compare the duodenal and stool microbiomes in PPI and non-PPI users. METHODS: Consecutive subjects presenting for upper endoscopy without colonoscopy were recruited. Current antibiotic users were excluded. Subjects taking PPI were age- and gender-matched 1:2 to non-PPI controls. Subjects completed medical history questionnaires, and duodenal aspirates were collected using a validated protected catheter. A subset also provided stool samples. Duodenal and stool microbiomes were analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing. RESULTS: The duodenal microbiome exhibited no phylum-level differences between PPI (N = 59) and non-PPI subjects (N = 118), but demonstrated significantly higher relative abundances of families Campylobacteraceae (3.13-fold, FDR P value < 0.01) and Bifidobacteriaceae (2.9-fold, FDR P value < 0.01), and lower relative abundance of Clostridiaceae (88.24-fold, FDR P value < 0.0001), in PPI subjects. SIBO rates were not significantly different between groups, whether defined by culture (> 103 CFU/ml) or 16S sequencing, nor between subjects taking different PPIs. The stool microbiome exhibited significantly higher abundance of family Streptococcaceae (2.14-fold, P = 0.003), and lower Clostridiaceae (2.60-fold, FDR P value = 8.61E-13), in PPI (N = 22) versus non-PPI (N = 47) subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PPI use is not associated with higher rates of SIBO. Relative abundance of Clostridiaceae was reduced in both the duodenal and stool microbiomes, and Streptococcaceae was increased in stool. The clinical implications of these findings are unknown.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Asa Ciega , Infecciones por Clostridium , Duodeno , Heces/microbiología , Intestino Delgado/microbiología , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Síndrome del Asa Ciega/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Asa Ciega/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Duodeno/efectos de los fármacos , Duodeno/microbiología , Duodeno/patología , Femenino , Microbioma Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultados Negativos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(1): 208-215, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33559090

RESUMEN

AIMS: Quinolone-containing triple therapy has been considered as the second-line therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). At present, there are no data to show the efficacy and safety of antofloxacin-based rescue therapy for the eradication of H. pylori, and this pilot clinical trial was designed. METHODS: A total of 196 patients who failed H. pylori eradication using the clarithromycin-based or metronidazole-based triple or bismuth quadruple therapy were randomly allocated to one of the following rescue eradication therapy groups: AEA group (antofloxacin 200 mg once daily, esomeprazole 20 mg + amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily) for 14 days, or LEA group (levofloxacin 500 mg once daily, esomeprazole 20 mg + amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily) for 14 days. The minimal inhibitory concentrations were tested by the E-test method. The gyrA mutation was analyzed by sequencing. Follow-up 13/14C-urea breath test was examined at 1 month after discontinuation. RESULTS: A total of 178 eligible patients were included in this study. The eradication rate was significantly higher in AEA group than in LEA group according to both ITT (87.6% vs. 68.5%; P = 0.002) and PP analyses (90.7% vs. 70.1%; P = 0.001). ITT analyses indicated that the eradication rate was significantly higher in AEA group than in LEA group with Asn87 mutation (78.9% vs. 31.3%; P = 0.005) and levofloxacin-resistant strains (76.9% vs. 44.2%; P = 0.003). Two groups exhibited similar adverse event rates (AEA 14.6% vs. LEA 20.2%, P = 0.323). CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that antofloxacin may be a promising candidate in rescue therapy for H. pylori eradication failure in China.


Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Esomeprazol/administración & dosificación , Gastritis , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Levofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Ofloxacino/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Pruebas Respiratorias/métodos , China , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Gastritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Gastritis/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Ofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA